enemy models

  • Thread starter Thread starter omega res novae
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just finished both textures, I'm sending the files to omega right now.. If he likes them I'll make the textures for the other frog versions,

frogtex.png


First is more close to the original.

While the other one is more customized and uses more realistic textures.
 
Maybe you can use both? Different textures for frogs in different areas? Both look good, and it would be a shame not to use them both.
 
It would really be omega's desicion I just offered to help with the textures..

Until timu or someone approves the model dont worry about an anime texture. If they like the model then they will give their input on the texture to make it suit their needs. As much as id like to be a member of ta the frog and my other models are just practice until i am good enough
Click to expand...
LoL sorry.. I did the other texture anyway even though you said not to bother with it for now.. THe texture was almost done anyway so I just completed it.. I'm uploading the files on the folder in google docs, you can do whatever you want with it, it's all yours.. ;D
Just tell me if you want me to continue with the other frogs using this style of texturing.. ;D
 
after touch me and toxic frog are done we can port them. the other 2 are apart of a move idk if they can use the same model
 
ohh.. you mean this two??
toxcme.png


LoL.. Its rather easier to make them since they are just variations of the previous texture..
 
you are legit whiteraven. ill start porting today if i get the chance. ill see if the the 2 ?'s in the op can use the same model. if yes then ill do those as well. if not ill adjust the model. they cant be that different
 
I can't speak for Timu, but I'd say you'd need to make some changes if you want this to be usable.

Looking at your wireframe, I'd say you really just need to look at optimising your model.

As great as it is to have mega high-res graphics crammed into as many parts of the game as you can, realistically, it's not necessary to have what looks like a 36 sided cylinder for each lower leg. This applies to the texture as well - you should only really be at a max of 5122 in this situation. It'll be a lot easier to work with at a smaller size, too.

Basically, just reduce the amount of polygons as far as possible until you actually start losing detail at the maximum zoom level used by the game itself - you don't need any more detail than that because nobody will ever see it, and also because you're making the graphics renderer do more work even though you're not seeing any noticeable difference.

I'm not saying you're going to slow down people's systems, and theoretically you can have as many polygons as you'd like, but a few of those on screen at the same time as well as all the other high resolution battle models and textures and you might start pushing some slightly older machines.

Optimisation is just a good habit to get into when working with models, especially when you're doing stuff for video games.
If it were me, I'd probably use max 6 sides for the limbs (not counting the thighs), and I'd probably try and at least half the polygons for the body and head. Remember, it's such a small model, and you rarely get to see it very close up.

Good Luck!
 
Last edited:
i understand what you mean. ill minimize the polys where i can. timu commented on a thread before. 12 sides around is what he said then. for caits weapons. ill optimize where i can but that may just be the feet and the limbs.
 
Regardless of NCS's comments, I have a pet peeve about the frog model, which concerns the mouth  :P (omega knows about this). Namely, a frog's mouth isn't flat, but parabolic, from below one eye to the other. I feel weird to be the only one to point that out!

Looking at your wireframe, I'd say you really just need to look at optimising your model.
[...]
Click to expand...
Even though you have much more knowledge than me about what's good practice in the video game industry, I have the following questions/comments (it may sound naive, but what the heck):
- Wouldn't it be good practice to make a very high-poly model, and then make downgrades from it which would in turn be incorporated in the game?
- I also wonder if the aforementioned suggestion would be best in our situation, given that our project has no "release date". I remember someone speculating in a release circa 2030, and that may be more realistic than not. In this case, low-poly models can quickly become outdated (a game like Gran Turismo 5 had this kind of issues). If one stores a very high-poly model somewhere, this one would be somewhat "time-proof". The downgrades from the high poly model could be performed depending on the computing power of the generation of hardware when they're released. Besides, I believe that most 3d modelling software (Blender among them) have very simple-to-use algorithms to make such downgrades.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought this aspect was to be accounted for before deciding of a modelling strategy.
 
maybe by 2030 frogs will have a flat mouth. i modeled this around the original without looking at any reference material. to go about fixing the mouth idk how id do that

also still waiting on the oppinions of someone that can grant approval
 
I tend to believe that the mouth was flat in the original model because it's a very low-poly model, rather than a design choice (remember the image I sent you? this one was precisely the concept art for FF7's frog). As for modifying the mouth shape... I suppose subdividing faces and moving the vertices around should do it, shouldn't it?
 
LoL.. no offense mayo.. but I just find it wierd to worry about a flat mouth being different from the real frog's mouth while infact we have a frog here standing on two legs and has hands.  ;D ;D ;D

But then I do understand that realistic look has it's good points but I don't think were bound by it too much while designing characters, In the end what looks good is what matters.
 
Omega had the same reply to that comment before, about how it's futile to worry about the mouth while the frog stands on its legs. I'll try to explain my pet peeve: while the frog stands on its legs, the legs shape itself makes sense (compared with a realistic picture, obviously the legs have a different scale, but that's not the point). A flat mouth shape just seems wrong, in my opinion.
But eh, it's just my opinion, and if nobody else cares, suit yourself.
 
It's not like it's a bad idea.. like I said for me what looks good is what matters, if changing the mouth to what you wanted will make the model look better, then I think it'll be good if omega heed your advise, well it depends if omega is up to it..
That is just in my opinion too so it'll depend on what the author thinks :) ;) :D..
 
Last edited:
Ill see what i can do. timu said head and face need more charactor. also a friend of mine thats a professional animator said it resembles a snakes head. so ill see what i can do.
for the mouth i imagine deleting some polys along the mouth and where the mouth will go
delete corners of the mouth.
extrude it to its new length. fill holes

ive thought before the cheeks were flat. this will give me a chance to round them.
eyes idk maybe round out the backs.
 
Last edited:
i understand what you mean. ill minimize the polys where i can. timu commented on a thread before. 12 sides around is what he said then. for caits weapons. ill optimize where i can but that may just be the feet and the limbs.
Click to expand...
Just remember, 12 sides is not likely to look any different from 6 sides at the resolution the frogs limbs will be displayed at. Especially since the only shading of the model will be done via your texture.

This is an image of two cylinders displayed with the battle engine's shading. Can you tell the difference? One has 8 sides and the other has 36. And this is displayed at a much higher resolution than those legs will be seen at. The majority of your detail should come from your texture, as that's what the battle engine is designed to display the most detail with.

The feet are looking fine if I'm honest, I wouldn't really change those too much.

- Wouldn't it be good practice to make a very high-poly model, and then make downgrades from it which would in turn be incorporated in the game?
Click to expand...
Not unless you're going to be using it in another situation where you'll be zooming in very close and rotating around an individual limb. 'Downgrading' isn't as simple as you may think.
It's like building a huge rocket for the sole purpose of heating some milk in your kitchen occasionally. Or something.

- I also wonder if the aforementioned suggestion would be best in our situation, given that our project has no "release date".
Click to expand...
Considering the production of FF7 was completed in 1996, the battle engine isn't likely to suddenly spontaneously change. The only other factor to really consider is typical screen resolution, which I don't think is likely to completely skyrocket anytime soon. Besides, 1080p HD is by far enough for this kind of project. Hell, updating the graphics to look nice at 640*480 would be a vast improvement.

Regarding the mouth thing, the point of this project is to build something around the original source using artistic license and original artwork to fill in details that aren't clear. As long as you're keeping roughly true to the original model, it's basically up to the artist.
 
Not unless you're going to be using it in another situation where you'll be zooming in very close and rotating around an individual limb. 'Downgrading' isn't as simple as you may think.
It's like building a huge rocket for the sole purpose of heating some milk in your kitchen occasionally. Or something.
Click to expand...
I second this. Not that my opinion matters or anything :D

There's two purposes that I can think of for having a high and low poly version of a given model. The first, like BlitzNCS noted, is if you're using it in another situation where the extra detail will be noticed such as an ultra-zoom in or in an FMV. The second is if you plan to bake the detail from the high poly onto the low poly. FFVII doesn't support normal maps to my knowledge, but you could potentially bake ambient occlusion from the high poly and blend it into the diffuse. But you really don't even need a high poly model for that; you could just bake the AO from the low poly I doubt there'd be a noticeable difference. And this is really at the heart of the matter: is the difference noticeable?

I also agree making low poly versions from high poly is more difficult than some think. Yes, you can use something like the decimate modifier in Blender, but it can't be controlled (besides changing raw face count) and going from 100,000 tris to 500 tris can produce unpredictable and undesirable results (such as long, thin triangles that need to be manually edited later anyway). You get the best results from retopologising (i.e., creating the low poly on top of the high poly)... which also happens to be the slowest process!

Ideally, a project's workflow is decided beforehand - either high polys are needed or they aren't (or certain predetermined models will be featured in situation X where a high poly is needed). Making them when they won't be used or noticed wastes dev time.
 
Last edited:
redid arms and lower leg they are now 8 sided. i will do the feet next. i extended the mouth some. i made the uv fit whiteravens texture just to have a general idea of what itd look like here are the results. itll look better once the texture is done.
newlips.png

newlips1.png
 
Haven't tried it, since model is not yet ported to ff7 format.. But I suspect it won't look as good, so after model is ported I'll make adjustments in the textures to make in more or less appear like those rendered images.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top