R
Rundas
Guest
Ah, I mix them up all the time.
Completely disagree. We are talking about a game that is still very playable and decent as it is, and had Sony not been an ass with their backward compatibility for all consoles, this update would be completely redundant. I don't think paying 20-40 dollars for updates to graphics is worthwhile (not this kind of update anyway). Call me crazy but I believe what made FFX great was the actual game-play, not whether you can see fur on Lulu's coat. This, to me, is just another sad symptom of SquareEnix and its modus operandi.. namely, to make money from nothing. Nothing original coming out of that company in terms of Final Fantasy. Just relying on fanbase to make profits.Calling $39.99 a ridiculous price for two remastered games is honestly stupid, it's cheap as hell. That's about £25 for what is going to be an excellent remaster of one of the best games on the PS2. I'd pay that for X alone, I just happen to be getting X-2 in the bargain. Oh also, trophies.
Listen, I am in no way a fan of the way Square Enix have been operating pretty much ever since they became Square-Enix, but I'm not going to jump on the hate bandwagon because they're releasing a HD remaster. And they're not trying to market it as a "remake", they've very clearly indicated that it's a remaster in every instance. The majority of companies with blockbuster PS2 titles have re-released their games in HD to massive success, so this is actually the best business decision they've made in years. This release means it's easily accessible to both new gamers and the people interested in the nostalgia trip through one of their favourite games, only it's enhanced with new features.Completely disagree. We are talking about a game that is still very playable and decent as it is, and had Sony not been an ass with their backward compatibility for all consoles, this update would be completely redundant. I don't think paying 20-40 dollars for updates to graphics is worthwhile (not this kind of update anyway). Call me crazy but I believe what made FFX great was the actual game-play, not whether you can see fur on Lulu's coat. This, to me, is just another sad symptom of SquareEnix and its modus operandi.. namely, to make money from nothing. Nothing original coming out of that company in terms of Final Fantasy. Just relying on fanbase to make profits.
Evidentally, it is working.
The only acceptable time to pay this money for this "remake" (which it isn't) is if you are playing it for the first time.
Edit: And trophies are a complete joke, and barrel scraping.
Firstly, if I was going to emulate Final Fantasy X on the PC, I'd use PCSX2 - which, unlike ePSXe - is actually a PS2 emulator. Secondly, the first screenshot is a shot of the game running full spec in PCSX2 at 1440x1080 resolution. That's what the game currently looks like emulated in HD. You must have manually updated all the textures in that scene by yourself if it somehow looks better than that. *shrugs*Also, Prince Lex you must be running epsxe at the bare minimum because mine looks much better than that. (although the ps3 one still looks far better)
What else would you think of with your setup and your 680? :evil:...which is pretty much all I play now...