The Internet is the most dangerous invention since the atomic bomb!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kudistos Megistos
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Kudistos Megistos

Guest
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wirestory?id=11425737

Yet another idiot talking about how the internet is the 27th thing that's going to kill the music industry (after radio, copying tapes, etc).

It's also amusing that his argument for the superiority of CDs over MP3s is word-for-word identical as the one that they used to make when complaining that CDs weren't as good as vinyl. One presumes he downloaded some shitty 128kb/s rips or is comparing his (presumably expensive) speaker setup to cheap iPod headphones.
 
these guys are getting seriousely pathetic, when will people learn the internet is hear to stay, and has bettered most lives, not killed it off. if someones bitter, don't blame the internet, cause they can't win
 
I'm confused. I thought the music industry had already been killed by cheap CD-Rs. Right after videotaping killed the film industry, and woodcuts killed literature.
 
woodcuts killed literature.
Click to expand...
Naw, dude. Literature was killed when bards went around singing other people's song for free. No doubt about it, Homer was a pirate, and all the people who listened to him were stealing from the poets who contributes to the myths. And don't forget Giglamesh. First epic? Moar like first THEFT! ;D
 
I will agree with his assesment that MP3's have killed audio quality. But apparently he is not aware of some of the lossless codecs out there that provide identical if not superior quality to CD's. FLAC for example is an amazing codec that can do 24bit/96kHz.
 
I was under the impression that, for most people, 320kb/s MP3s are indistinguishable from FLAC. Of course, lower bitrate MP3s are bound to sound worse, and I imagine that this is what that man was listening to.
 
Its hard to say, I have a fairly high end system, but I have not done a double blind on a FLAC vs mp3 320kbps. I have noticed a difference between FLAC and 256kbps however.
 
I don't know. I never really had it tested. People have commented me on my 'golden ear'. Sadly that changed somewhat due to the tinnitus in one ear due to a drunk friend throwing a firecracker at me and having it blow up right beside my ear.
 
I've always had terrible hearing, so 56kb/s from crappy headphones sounds god-like to me ;D

Not quite, but I'm able to make do with very low audio quality.

However, I've recently been developing videophile tendencies. Feels bad, man; there are no HD releases of Lucky Star :'(
 
I've always had terrible hearing, so 56kb/s from crappy headphones sounds god-like to me ;D

Not quite, but I'm able to make do with very low audio quality.

However, I've recently been developing videophile tendencies. Feels bad, man; there are no HD releases of Lucky Star :'(
Click to expand...
I do not know what Lucky Star is but I do feel your pain. I absolutely refuse to watch any movie unless it is on blu-ray.
 
>I do not know what Lucky Star is

1268711181248.png
 
I've always had terrible hearing, so 56kb/s from crappy headphones sounds god-like to me ;D

Not quite, but I'm able to make do with very low audio quality.

However, I've recently been developing videophile tendencies. Feels bad, man; there are no HD releases of Lucky Star :'(
Click to expand...
I do not know what Lucky Star is but I do feel your pain. I absolutely refuse to watch any movie unless it is on blu-ray.
Click to expand...
Agreed on the blu-ray! tv hurts my eyes -.-

on the music topic, I keep all my music in apple lossless (damn apple not accepting FLAC) and they sound tons better then mp3 (at least at up to 256kbps)
 
You guys wanna try streaming TV shows online when megavideo has deleted EVERY SINGLE link because of infringement.

http://screencast.com/t/OGE3MmE5ZDY
That's the kinda stuff I'm putting up with right now. I want to commit suicide when I think about how bad the video AND sound quality is, which is all the time. It says HD, but believe me, It's not. The player's not even english, either. I'm just not gonna buy those expensive boxsets, dammit!

And by streaming TV shows online, I clearly mean watching them on legitimate DVDs which I bought.
 
Last edited:
THIEFFFFFFFFFF!

In all seriousness, TV does seem to be one thing that is suffering because of the internet. Not because of piracy, but because the internet is vastly superior.

EDIT:

Since we were on the subject of audiophilia:

lolz0rz! ;D
 
Last edited:
tv and CDs are both destined to change, the way the are distrubuted is ancient. Why the hell would i sit through an actual TV program and deal with all the commercials when i can DVR it and skip them all, or simply hit hulu or a torrent site and grab the latest episodes in HD without commericals?

Same goes for CDs. Sadly it is easier and faster to download a CD than it is to get in the car and drive to the store. Its cheaper as well. I hate apple but iTunes was a great freaking idea! I just wonder what best buy is gonna put in the other half of their stores once CDs become scarce.
 
TV would be in serious trouble without ad revenue; we're likely to see a lot more reality TV shows and far less quality TV (not that there's much now...)

Overpaid TV personalities will take a big hit in the wallet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top