Topic of phrases that come up when you are drunk

  • Thread starter Thread starter FeliX Leonhart
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

FeliX Leonhart

Guest
In terms of commonplace erudition each local individual, internalizing abstraction, should not neglect the criteria of utopian subjectivity!
 
In terms of commonplace erudition each local individual, internalizing abstraction, should not neglect the criteria of utopian subjectivity!
Click to expand...
Whoever said that must have been really out of it.
 
In terms of commonplace erudition each local individual, internalizing abstraction, should not neglect the criteria of utopian subjectivity!
Click to expand...
anyone willing to argue for or against this statement?
 
Does anyone know such complicated sentences? Knowing them is good for blowing the minds of the listeners:P
 
my dad was drunk often, and some of the things he'd say was:

"go get me a monkey before i smack your brother"

"if you ever turn gay, i'll stab you in the colon"

then again, the worst thing he did when he was drunk, he never said a word.
 
In terms of commonplace erudition each local individual, internalizing abstraction, should not neglect the criteria of utopian subjectivity!
Click to expand...
I'm not native english so that sentence just blows my mind; and i find myself quite keen at english.
 
I'm not native english so that sentence just blows my mind; and i find myself quite keen at english.
Click to expand...
The sentence blows your mind because it's absolute nonsense.

One of the favourite tricks of philosophical charlatans is to write sentences filled with big words that sound very intelligent indeed, but are actually meaningless. They hope that you'll be too awestruck to notice that the sentence is nonsense, or that you'll be embarrassed to admit that you can't make sense of it.

I'm sure that Mr Leonhart is not a charlatan himself, and is just making fun of these people. 8)
 
One of the favourite tricks of philosophical charlatans is to write sentences filled with big words that sound very intelligent indeed, but are actually meaningless.
Click to expand...
Paging Mr. Heidegger.

Actually, I'm willing to put just about any 20th century continental philosopher in my sights for this. Deconstructionists especially.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I'm willing to put just about any 20th century continental philosopher in my sights for this. Deconstructionists especially.
Click to expand...
I love how your political and philosophical ideas have been shifting closer to mine over the past few months. ;D
 
Explain the last two posts for the Non-Educated.
Click to expand...
20th century French philosophers wrote complete bullshit and hoped no-one would notice because they used lots of big words.
 
Posting in the most enlightening thead of all time.
Click to expand...
Yup. You now know the dark secret behind (post)modern philosophy. Use this knowledge wisely, my child.
 
In terms of commonplace erudition each local individual, internalizing abstraction, should not neglect the criteria of utopian subjectivity!
Click to expand...
I'm not native english so that sentence just blows my mind; and i find myself quite keen at english.
Click to expand...
I am ashamed to admit I Wikipedia most of these words! Then I had a couple of drinks and viola! Made perfect non-sense :P Pertaining to the topic...

 I am often intoxicated, the "phrases" that usually follow can not be understood by humans :)
 
Explain the last two posts for the Non-Educated.
Click to expand...
Deconstructionists are a group of post-structuralist European (mostly French) philosophers who believe that, since the Greek tradition, Western philosophy has made excessively bold assumptions about the power of the 'logos' or sign. Deconstructionists have little faith in the ability of language to communicate, because any sign X only exists by virtue of being opposed to the sign not-X. They have a suspicion of dichotomies (where 'things' can be divided into pairs of broad categories) and, like post-modernists, reject the idea of teleology and 'grand narratives' (big narratives that transform lots of little concrete historical events into 'movements' towards an abstract goal. Marxism, where all material events lead to an inevitable revolution via dialectical materialism, and Christianity, where all things lead to the fruition of a prophecy, are both examples of 'grand narratives').
 
Deconstructionists are a group of post-structuralist European (mostly French) philosophers who believe that, since the Greek tradition, Western philosophy has made excessively bold assumptions about the power of the 'logos' or sign. Deconstructionists have little faith in the ability of language to communicate, because any sign X only exists by virtue of being opposed to the sign not-X. They have a suspicion of dichotomies (where 'things' can be divided into pairs of broad categories) and, like post-modernists, reject the idea of teleology and 'grand narratives' (big narratives that transform lots of little concrete historical events into 'movements' towards an abstract goal. Marxism, where all material events lead to an inevitable revolution via dialectical materialism, and Christianity, where all things lead to the fruition of a prophecy, are both examples of 'grand narratives').
Click to expand...
for the Non-Educated
Click to expand...
 :o
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top