D
DLPB_
Guest
Doing it on the pngs would take my life away 
Problem is that you're also enhancing blocking and ringing effects, those would need filtering before doing any resizing. I'm also looking for the best way to deblock without losing too much details (quest of the Holy Graal I guess
I used to think the same, until I saw the results of his current method. No on-the-fly resizing could possibly deliver edges this sharp.You know, there's no point in upscaling such low quality videos to 4x the original resolution. You'll just put the CPU under unnecessary stress when decoding them.
2x the original resolution would be optimal for these videos. Let the codec do the rest of the resizing.
Just my 2 cents.
Of course not, but 2x the resolution using this method will already make the edges sharp enough without looking too over filtered.I used to think the same, until I saw the results of his current method. No on-the-fly resizing could possibly deliver edges this sharp.You know, there's no point in upscaling such low quality videos to 4x the original resolution. You'll just put the CPU under unnecessary stress when decoding them.
2x the original resolution would be optimal for these videos. Let the codec do the rest of the resizing.
Just my 2 cents.
I'm not sure older CPU's would use this, Being as they would be to large of a resolution, As is you'll need at least 1280 x 960 to use them.Of course not, but 2x the resolution using this method will already make the edges sharp enough without looking too over filtered.I used to think the same, until I saw the results of his current method. No on-the-fly resizing could possibly deliver edges this sharp.You know, there's no point in upscaling such low quality videos to 4x the original resolution. You'll just put the CPU under unnecessary stress when decoding them.
2x the original resolution would be optimal for these videos. Let the codec do the rest of the resizing.
Just my 2 cents.
The videos don't have that much detail to begin with, there's no reason to make older CPUs struggle to decode these at full speed. Save that for a higher quality source (like HD videos).
It has to be 4X, 2X will not create this level of quality and CPU speeds increase all the time. It is better to overdo than to underdo and I have chosen 4X.Of course not, but 2x the resolution using this method will already make the edges sharp enough without looking too over filtered.I used to think the same, until I saw the results of his current method. No on-the-fly resizing could possibly deliver edges this sharp.You know, there's no point in upscaling such low quality videos to 4x the original resolution. You'll just put the CPU under unnecessary stress when decoding them.
2x the original resolution would be optimal for these videos. Let the codec do the rest of the resizing.
Just my 2 cents.
The videos don't have that much detail to begin with, there's no reason to make older CPUs struggle to decode these at full speed. Save that for a higher quality source (like HD videos).
True, I forgot about that for some reason. I guess it's fine then.Also if your computer can't handle 4x but 2x works fine, there are dozens of video editing tools that can shrink them for free.
It won't be me doing it though ;DTrue, I forgot about that for some reason. I guess it's fine then.Also if your computer can't handle 4x but 2x works fine, there are dozens of video editing tools that can shrink them for free.
That's fine, I already have the necessary tool installed.It won't be me doing it though ;DTrue, I forgot about that for some reason. I guess it's fine then.Also if your computer can't handle 4x but 2x works fine, there are dozens of video editing tools that can shrink them for free.